Why Digital Medium Format Not DSLR
I believe each camera system has its own edge and its own playground.
As a medium format photographer, I chose mainly digital medium format / tech camera for landscape photography because:
-
large and bright viewfinder
-
touch screen interface; hard to find a system you can check 100% focus on faster on a specific part of the image than a Phase One IQ Back
-
more tactile lens response when manually focusing
-
ability to shoot vertical without rotating camera
-
low ISO without ND filters
-
ability to shoot film with same system as digital
-
ability to crop a vertical and horizontal from the same frame
-
ability to use on tech cameras
-
rise/fall/shift/swing/tilt on lens
-
fully mechanical/traditional shooting
-
absolute best glass
-
compatibility with view cameras
-
close focus possible with many lenses, not just select macros
-
rise/fall/shift/swing/tilt on every lens, not just select TS lenses
-
less frequent updates required
-
longer software support
-
consistent shooting speed; a Phase One IQ can maintain it's frame-rate indefinitely
-
with a fast CF card, any Canon/Nikon can shoot much faster but unless you restrain yourself you can easily hit a buffer and the camera won't fire when you think it should. The IQ or Credo will be slower (around 1.2fps for the 40mp model) but it is reliably consistent - you know when you can shoot next and can develop a rhythm.